mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	bp@alien8.de, mingo@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	konrad.wilk@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH] x86, microcode: Add local mutex to not hit a deadlock.
Date: Wed,  8 May 2013 12:13:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368029583-23337-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (raw)

This can easily be triggered if a new CPU is added (via
ACPI hotplug mechanism) and from user-space do:

echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online

(or wait for UDEV to do it) on a newly appeared CPU.

The deadlock is that the "store_online" in drivers/base/cpu.c
takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock, then calls "cpu_up".
"cpu_up" eventually ends up calling "save_mc_for_early"
which also takes the cpu_hotplug_driver_lock() lock.

And here is that kernel thinks of it:

smpboot: Stack at about ffff880075c39f44
smpboot: CPU3: has booted.
microcode: CPU3 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x2, revision=0x25

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.9.0upstream-10129-g167af0e #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
sh/2487 is trying to acquire lock:
 (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20

but task is already holding lock:
 (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex);
  lock(x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

6 locks held by sh/2487:
 #0:  (sb_writers#5){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811ca48d>] vfs_write+0x17d/0x190
 #1:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff812464ef>] sysfs_write_file+0x3f/0x160
 #2:  (s_active#20){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81246578>] sysfs_write_file+0xc8/0x160
 #3:  (x86_cpu_hotplug_driver_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81075512>] cpu_hotplug_driver_lock+0x12/0x20
 #4:  (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810961c2>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x12/0x20
 #5:  (cpu_hotplug.lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810962a7>] cpu_hotplug_begin+0x27/0x60

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # for v3.9
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c
index d893e8e..2e9e128 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c
@@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static inline void show_saved_mc(void)
 #endif
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL_EARLY) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
 /*
  * Save this mc into mc_saved_data. So it will be loaded early when a CPU is
  * hot added or resumes.
@@ -507,7 +508,7 @@ int save_mc_for_early(u8 *mc)
 	 * Hold hotplug lock so mc_saved_data is not accessed by a CPU in
 	 * hotplug.
 	 */
-	cpu_hotplug_driver_lock();
+	mutex_lock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
 
 	mc_saved_count_init = mc_saved_data.mc_saved_count;
 	mc_saved_count = mc_saved_data.mc_saved_count;
@@ -544,7 +545,7 @@ int save_mc_for_early(u8 *mc)
 	}
 
 out:
-	cpu_hotplug_driver_unlock();
+	mutex_unlock(&x86_cpu_microcode_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6


             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-08 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-08 16:13 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-05-08 18:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-08 18:41   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-09 13:00 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/microcode: Add local mutex to fix physical CPU hot-add deadlock tip-bot for Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-15 18:25 ` [PATCH] x86, microcode: Add local mutex to not hit a deadlock Yu, Fenghua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1368029583-23337-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®