From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755388Ab3EPHRv (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 03:17:51 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:62782 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754310Ab3EPHRu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 03:17:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,681,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="303235155" Message-ID: <1368688777.15764.175.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Export the ecc step size to user applications From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Huang Shijie Cc: Huang Shijie , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , LKML Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:19:37 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1368607606-4344-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <1368619642.15764.96.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 22:19 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: > ok. can i send a separate patch to fix it? > or a new version patch set？ > Just a follow-up patch. I would like to let this patch-set sit in the mailing list for some time before I pick it, in case someone wants to comment. Also, surely the things you expose are the real ECC step and ECC strength? I think the datasheet ones in your other patch-set should be named differently to make sure the reader of the code understands that they are only the recommended datasheet values, not necessarily the values which are actually in use. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy