From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934993Ab3E2CLA (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 22:11:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:44923 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934963Ab3E2CK7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 22:10:59 -0400 From: Grant Likely To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Try out the irqdomain + generic chip integration series Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 03:10:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1369793454-19197-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, Rather than just straight reviewing the generic irq chip patch series, I tried it out by converting another driver to use it. As far as I've been able to tell it does the right thing and you can have my ack. The first patch in this series adds another feature needed by the versatile driver. Patch 2 should be okay, but I'd like to get an ack from Ben before it gets applied. I need to get someone to test patch 3 on hardware before you pick up that one. Oh, and I'll reply directly to patch 7 of your series with an ack and a minor comment. Cheers, g.