From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755250Ab3EaOe2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 10:34:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:34524 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752102Ab3EaOeW (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 10:34:22 -0400 From: Richard Genoud To: David Woodhouse Cc: Josh Wu , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Genoud Subject: [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: using a stronger ECC is not dangerous Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:34:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1370010850-20860-1-git-send-email-richard.genoud@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We don't have to issue a warning when a stronger error correting capability is chosen. Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud --- drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c index 2d23d29..2415cdc 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev, return err_no; } - if (cap != host->pmecc_corr_cap || + if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap || sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size) dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n"); -- 1.7.10.4