From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-twl: fix initialization sequence
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:19:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370431162-24185-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> (raw)
The twl-rtc has the following dependencies from other drivers during the boot:
pinctrl
|-i2c-omap
|- twl-core
|- twl-rtc
The i2c-omap probe may be deferred because pinctrl iss not ready yet. As result,
i2c-omap will be probed at late init time. Which, in turn, will delay twl-core
initialization till late init time too.
But, the twl-rtc driver is registered from finction twl_rtc_init() at
module(device) init time and contains part of its initialization code within it.
Unfortunatelly, this code depends on twl-core which may be not ready at that
moment and, as result, wrong register map will be selected
(on OMAP3 twl6030_rtc_reg_map will be selected instead of twl4030_rtc_reg_map).
static int __init twl_rtc_init(void)
{
if (twl_class_is_4030()) <--- twl-core might be not ready here
<--- and twl_class_is_4030() will return 0
rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
else
rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
return platform_driver_register(&twl4030rtc_driver);
}
Hence, move register map selection code in twl_rtc_probe() to solve this issue.
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
index bbda0fd..1698115 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
@@ -481,6 +481,11 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (irq <= 0)
goto out1;
+ if (twl_class_is_4030())
+ rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
+ else
+ rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
+
ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
if (ret < 0)
goto out1;
@@ -622,11 +627,6 @@ static struct platform_driver twl4030rtc_driver = {
static int __init twl_rtc_init(void)
{
- if (twl_class_is_4030())
- rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl4030_rtc_reg_map;
- else
- rtc_reg_map = (u8 *) twl6030_rtc_reg_map;
-
return platform_driver_register(&twl4030rtc_driver);
}
module_init(twl_rtc_init);
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 11:19 Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2013-06-05 11:25 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1370431162-24185-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®