From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755048Ab3FKMkX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:40:23 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:55649 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754743Ab3FKMkW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:40:22 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,845,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="351675904" Message-ID: <1370954397.29283.329.camel@smile> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dw_dmac: move to own folder and split From: Andy Shevchenko To: Vinod Koul Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann , Felipe Balbi Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:39:57 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1370435206-13474-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <1370435206-13474-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:26 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > This is split of the dw_dmac driver as suggested by Arnd et al [1,2]. > There are three most important patches: > 2/4 moves driver to its own folder > 3/4 does the actual split > 4/4 introduces PCI part of the driver > > During this files are renamed: mostly means that dw_dmac prefix is eliminated. > I hope to get it ready to be included in v3.11. > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1408174.html > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1408495.html > > Changes v1->v2: > - address Arnd's comments > - compile test when !CONFIG_PM > - apply ACKs > > Cnages v0->v1: > - apply Viresh's ACKs > - append PCI part of the driver > - test altogether on Intel Medfield > - add 1/4 to the series as it based on it, but Vinod didn't apply it yet to > his tree. Vinod, do you have any comments on this? We would like to have this scheduled for v3.11. I think we still have few days if you think we need to improve this patchset. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy