mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<leiwen@marvell.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] sched: scale the busy and this queue's per-task load before compare
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:04:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1371560659-4686-3-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371560659-4686-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com>

Since for max_load and this_load, they are the value that already be
scaled. It is not reasonble to get a minimum value between the scaled
and non-scaled value, like below example.
	min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->max_load);

Also add comment over in what condition, there would be cpu power gain
in move the load.

Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 28052fa..fd9cbee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4686,16 +4686,19 @@ static int check_asym_packing(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
  *			load balancing.
  * @env: The load balancing environment.
  * @sds: Statistics of the sched_domain whose imbalance is to be calculated.
+ * @scaled_busiest_load_per_task: per calculated busist queue average load
  */
 static inline
-void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
+		unsigned long scaled_busy_load_per_task)
 {
 	unsigned long tmp, pwr_now = 0, pwr_move = 0;
+	unsigned long scaled_this_load_per_task;
 	unsigned int imbn = 2;
-	unsigned long scaled_busy_load_per_task;
 
 	if (sds->this_nr_running) {
 		sds->this_load_per_task /= sds->this_nr_running;
+
 		if (sds->busiest_load_per_task >
 				sds->this_load_per_task)
 			imbn = 1;
@@ -4704,9 +4707,10 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
 			cpu_avg_load_per_task(env->dst_cpu);
 	}
 
-	scaled_busy_load_per_task = sds->busiest_load_per_task
-					 * SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
-	scaled_busy_load_per_task /= sds->busiest->sgp->power;
+	/* Scale this_load_per_task to local power not related */
+	scaled_this_load_per_task = sds->this_load_per_task
+					<< SCHED_POWER_SHIFT;
+	scaled_this_load_per_task /= sds->this->sgp->power;
 
 	if (sds->max_load - sds->this_load + scaled_busy_load_per_task >=
 			(scaled_busy_load_per_task * imbn)) {
@@ -4721,28 +4725,35 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
 	 */
 
 	pwr_now += sds->busiest->sgp->power *
-			min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->max_load);
+			min(scaled_busy_load_per_task, sds->max_load);
 	pwr_now += sds->this->sgp->power *
-			min(sds->this_load_per_task, sds->this_load);
+			min(scaled_this_load_per_task, sds->this_load);
 	pwr_now /= SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
 
 	/* Amount of load we'd subtract */
 	if (sds->max_load > scaled_busy_load_per_task) {
 		pwr_move += sds->busiest->sgp->power *
-			min(sds->busiest_load_per_task,
+			min(scaled_busy_load_per_task,
 				sds->max_load - scaled_busy_load_per_task);
-		tmp = (sds->busiest_load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
-			sds->this->sgp->power;
+		tmp = scaled_busy_load_per_task;
 	} else
-		tmp = (sds->max_load * sds->busiest->sgp->power) /
-			sds->this->sgp->power;
+		tmp = sds->max_load;
 
+	/* Scale to this queue from busiest queue */
+	tmp = (tmp * sds->busiest->sgp->power) /
+		sds->this->sgp->power;
 	/* Amount of load we'd add */
 	pwr_move += sds->this->sgp->power *
-			min(sds->this_load_per_task, sds->this_load + tmp);
+			min(scaled_this_load_per_task, sds->this_load + tmp);
 	pwr_move /= SCHED_POWER_SCALE;
 
 	/* Move if we gain throughput */
+	/*
+	 * The only possibilty for below statement be true, is:
+	 * sds->max_load is larger than sds->busiest_load_per_task, while,
+	 * sds->busiest_load_per_task is larger than sds->this_load plus by
+	 * the scaled sds->busiest_load_per_task moved into this queue
+	 */
 	if (pwr_move > pwr_now)
 		env->imbalance = sds->busiest_load_per_task;
 }
@@ -4756,11 +4767,21 @@ void fix_small_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
 static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
 {
 	unsigned long max_pull, load_above_capacity = ~0UL;
+	unsigned long scaled_busy_load_per_task;
 
 	sds->busiest_load_per_task /= sds->busiest_nr_running;
+
+	/* Scale busiest_load_per_task to local power not related */
+	scaled_busy_load_per_task = sds->busiest_load_per_task
+					<<  SCHED_POWER_SHIFT;
+	scaled_busy_load_per_task /= sds->busiest->sgp->power;
+
 	if (sds->group_imb) {
-		sds->busiest_load_per_task =
-			min(sds->busiest_load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
+		scaled_busy_load_per_task =
+			min(scaled_busy_load_per_task, sds->avg_load);
+		sds->busiest_load_per_task = scaled_busy_load_per_task
+						* sds->busiest->sgp->power;
+		sds->busiest_load_per_task >>= SCHED_POWER_SHIFT;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4770,7 +4791,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
 	 */
 	if (sds->max_load < sds->avg_load) {
 		env->imbalance = 0;
-		return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
+		return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds, scaled_busy_load_per_task);
 	}
 
 	if (!sds->group_imb) {
@@ -4809,7 +4830,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
 	 * moved
 	 */
 	if (env->imbalance < sds->busiest_load_per_task)
-		return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds);
+		return fix_small_imbalance(env, sds, scaled_busy_load_per_task);
 
 }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 13:04 [PATCH v4 0/4] small fix for scale usage Lei Wen
2013-06-18 13:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] sched: reduce calculation effort in fix_small_imbalance Lei Wen
2013-06-18 13:04 ` Lei Wen [this message]
2013-06-18 13:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] sched: scale cpu load for judgment of group imbalance Lei Wen
2013-06-18 13:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] sched: adjust fix_small_imbalance moving task condition Lei Wen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1371560659-4686-3-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com \
    --to=leiwen@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®