From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC1CC65C20 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 12:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8E42075C for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 12:05:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0D8E42075C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727968AbeJHTRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:17:17 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:46344 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726995AbeJHTRR (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:17:17 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Oct 2018 05:05:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,356,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="263835401" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2018 05:05:51 -0700 Received: from [10.125.251.251] (abudanko-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.125.251.251]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD3E580034; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 05:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving collected data To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel References: <7d42aa80-8e69-44e4-b963-e8ef89df2099@linux.intel.com> <0ff162a6-67ab-9e73-8d7e-fa57c932ee45@linux.intel.com> <20181008105102.GE17270@krava> From: Alexey Budankov Organization: Intel Corp. Message-ID: <1371c609-503f-f778-3ab0-b5a61965981c@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 15:05:48 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181008105102.GE17270@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 08.10.2018 13:51, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:14:29AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > could you please separate those in struct, maybe anonymous like: > > ... > struct { > void *data; > struct aiocb cblock; > int nr_cblocks; > } aio; > ... > Accepted. > >> }; >> >> /* >> @@ -59,6 +67,9 @@ enum bkw_mmap_state { >> struct mmap_params { >> int prot, mask; >> struct auxtrace_mmap_params auxtrace_mp; >> +#ifdef HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT >> + int nr_cblocks; >> +#endif > > I dont think we need the ifdef here.. IMO one extra int is not > worth of the ifdef endif confusion Accepted. Thanks, Alexey > > jirka >