mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler accounting inflated for io bound processes.
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:01:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372262508.8776.83.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130626155048.GA7399@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 17:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:37:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Would be very nice to randomize the sampling rate, by randomizing the 
> > > intervals within a 1% range or so - perf tooling will probably recognize 
> > > the different weights.
> > 
> > You're suggesting adding noise to the regular kernel tick?
> 
> No, to the perf interval (which I assumed Mike was using to profile this?)

Yeah, perf top -F 250 exhibits the same inaccuracy as 250 Hz tick cpu
accounting.  (sufficient sample jitter should cure it, but I think I'd
prefer to just live with it)

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-26 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-20 19:46 Dave Chiluk
2013-06-25 16:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-25 17:48   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-26  9:37     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 10:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 15:50         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 16:01           ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2013-06-26 16:04           ` David Ahern
2013-06-26 16:10             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 16:13               ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1372262508.8776.83.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=chiluk@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome