is it desirable to improve the build system?

[Mark Galeck <mark_galeck@pacbell.net>]

Dear Linux-Kernel Community,

I am a consultant specializing in builds, and I recently worked for a large client company, a world-wide leader in its field, where I overhauled their build system: sped it up by more of an order of magnitude, and improved maintainability, for example making comment-to-code ratio approach 1:1. 

A part of their build is a modified Linux kernel. I rebuilt it countless times in various configurations, but made only a few further changes, because those improvements would have a small effect on the whole system, and because they want to stay close to your current release for ease of porting.

>From that limited experience, it nevertheless seemed to me, that the Linux kernel build, while correct, is somewhat slow, and the sources could be more readable.

Does the Linux-Kernel Community perceive that is the case?

If so, do you think it is possible to improve?

If so, would such an attempt be welcome, including and especially by, the current maintainer(s) of the build?  Of course it would have to be completely backwards-compatible, including to the text output interface and requirements for modules makefiles.

I do apologize if my impressions are simply the result of unfamilliarity and naivete, and that I don't understand the deep reasons why "it has to be this way", and that I am unaware that such attempts were already made by some very skilled people.  

Thank you,

Mark