[PATCH v2] x86/kvm/emulate.c: simplify NOP (opcode 0x90) check

[Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>]

We do not need to check for reg == RAX for opcodes 0x91...0x97.

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 2bc1e81..2dc48a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -4544,9 +4544,14 @@ special_insn:
 	case 0x8d: /* lea r16/r32, m */
 		ctxt->dst.val = ctxt->src.addr.mem.ea;
 		break;
-	case 0x90 ... 0x97: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */
+	case 0x90: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */
+		/* Not all opcodes 90 are NOPs, only ones which refer to RAX */
+		/* For example, 49 90 is xchg %rax,%r8 */
+		/* Bare 90 and 40 90 (redundant REX prefix) are nop */
 		if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX))
 			break;
+		/* Fall through */
+	case 0x91 ... 0x97: /* xchg reg, rax */
 		rc = em_xchg(ctxt);
 		break;
 	case 0x98: /* cbw/cwde/cdqe */
-- 
1.8.1.4