From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753391Ab3GHDyI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 23:54:08 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:46082 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752183Ab3GHDyG (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jul 2013 23:54:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1373255644.1893.3.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [v9fs:for-linus 7/7] ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible From: Joe Perches To: Fengguang Wu Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen , Jim Garlick , Andy Whitcroft , LKML Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 20:54:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130708033004.GA20091@localhost> References: <51d9c6c4.k6qhnvy45dNR8Ghq%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20130708004233.GA8958@localhost> <20130708033004.GA20091@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 11:30 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > In long run I'd like to disable > the check types that tend to have false positives. As for now, these > checks are disabled in my checkpatch robot: Are you using a .checkpatch.conf file? > PATCH_PREFIX > LONG_LINE > CAMELCASE That's a --strict test > MISSING_SIGN_OFF Why would you even consider this one? > COMPLEX_MACRO > BRACES > SPACING > LONG_LINE OK by me. > REDUNDANT_CODE Also a --strict test > TRAILING_STATEMENTS False positives? Got an example? > UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION