mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86: Avoid checkpointed counters causing excessive TSX aborts v4
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:10:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374189015-19950-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

With checkpointed counters there can be a situation where the counter
is overflowing, aborts the transaction, is set back to a non overflowing
checkpoint, causes interupt. The interrupt doesn't see the overflow
because it has been checkpointed.  This is then a spurious PMI, typically with
a ugly NMI message.  It can also lead to excessive aborts.

Avoid this problem by:
- Using the full counter width for counting counters (earlier patch)
- Forbid sampling for checkpointed counters. It's not too useful anyways,
checkpointing is mainly for counting. The check is approximate
(to still handle KVM), but should catch the majority of cases.
- On a PMI always set back checkpointed counters to zero.

v2: Add unlikely. Add comment
v3: Allow large sampling periods with CP for KVM
v4: Use event_is_checkpointed. Use EOPNOTSUPP. (Stephane Eranian)
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index ef9236b..10b51f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1137,6 +1137,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
 }
 
+static inline bool event_is_checkpointed(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	return (event->hw.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) != 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Save and restart an expired event. Called by NMI contexts,
  * so it has to be careful about preempting normal event ops:
@@ -1144,6 +1149,17 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	x86_perf_event_update(event);
+	/*
+	 * For a checkpointed counter always reset back to 0.  This
+	 * avoids a situation where the counter overflows, aborts the
+	 * transaction and is then set back to shortly before the
+	 * overflow, and overflows and aborts again.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(event_is_checkpointed(event))) {
+		/* No race with NMIs because the counter should not be armed */
+		wrmsrl(event->hw.event_base, 0);
+		local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, 0);
+	}
 	return x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
 }
 
@@ -1227,6 +1243,15 @@ again:
 		x86_pmu.drain_pebs(regs);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * To avoid spurious interrupts with perf stat always reset checkpointed
+	 * counters.
+	 *
+	 * XXX move somewhere else.
+	 */
+	if (cpuc->events[2] && event_is_checkpointed(cpuc->events[2]))
+		status |= (1ULL << 2);
+
 	for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
 		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
 
@@ -1692,6 +1717,20 @@ static int hsw_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	      event->attr.precise_ip > 0))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
+	if (event_is_checkpointed(event)) {
+		/*
+		 * Sampling of checkpointed events can cause situations where
+		 * the CPU constantly aborts because of a overflow, which is
+		 * then checkpointed back and ignored. Forbid checkpointing
+		 * for sampling.
+		 *
+		 * But still allow a long sampling period, so that perf stat
+		 * from KVM works.
+		 */
+		if (event->attr.sample_period > 0 &&
+		    event->attr.sample_period < 0x7fffffff)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4


                 reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 23:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1374189015-19950-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®