From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Mike Christie <mchristie@fusionio.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:14:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374358463.7397.1124.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EAA33C.9010405@fusionio.com>
On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 09:48 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 11:56 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 14:01 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:33 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
<SNIP>
> >>
> >> Indeed. Looking into the bio_copy_kern() breakage next..
> >>
> >
> > OK, after further investigation the root cause is a actually a missing
> > bio->bio_end_io() -> bio_copy_kern_endio() -> bio_put() from the
> > blk_end_sync_rq() callback path that scsi-mq REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC is
> > currently using.
> >
> > Including the following patch into the scsi-mq working branch now, and
> > reverting the libata dma_alignment=0x03 hack.
> >
> > Alexander, care to give this a try..?
> >
> > --nab
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
> > index 0761c89..70303d2 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-exec.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-exec.c
> > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ static void blk_end_sync_rq(struct request *rq, int error)
> > struct completion *waiting = rq->end_io_data;
> >
> > rq->end_io_data = NULL;
> > - if (!rq->q->mq_ops) {
> > + if (rq->q->mq_ops) {
> > + if (rq->bio)
> > + bio_endio(rq->bio, error);
> > + } else {
> > __blk_put_request(rq->q, rq);
> > }
> >
>
>
> This does not handle requests with multiple bios, and for the mq stye
> passthrough insertion completions you actually want to call
> blk_mq_finish_request in scsi_execute. Same for all the other
> passthrough code in your scsi mq tree. That is your root bug. Instead of
> doing that though I think we want to have the block layer free the bios
> like before.
>
> For the non mq calls, blk_end_request type of calls will complete the
> bios when blk_finish_request is called from that path. It will then call
> the rq end_io callback.
>
> I think the blk mq code assumes if the end_io callack is set that the
> end_io function will do the bio cleanup. See __blk_mq_end_io. Also see
> how blk_mq_execute_rq calls blk_mq_finish_request for an example of how
> rq passthrough execution and cleanup is being done in the mq paths.
>
> Now with the scsi mq changes, when blk_execute_rq_nowait calls
> blk_mq_insert_request it calls it with a old non mq style of end io
> function that does not complete the bios.
>
> What about the attached only compile tested patch. The patch has the mq
> block code work like the non mq code for bio cleanups.
>
>
OK, so with your blk-mq patch in place to always call
blk_mq_finish_request() in blk_mq_complete_request() regardless of
rq->end_io, the preceding scsi_mq_end_request() can now simply call
blk_mq_end_io() for both BLOCK_RQ and FS request types.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi-mq.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi-mq.c
index 81b2633..f1d4789 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi-mq.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi-mq.c
@@ -93,19 +93,7 @@ struct scsi_cmnd *scsi_mq_end_request(struct scsi_cmnd *sc, int error,
#endif
//FIXME: Add proper blk_mq_end_io residual bytes + requeue
- if (rq->end_io) {
-#if 0
- printk("scsi_mq_end_request: Calling rq->end_io BLOCK_PC for"
- " CDB: 0x%02x\n", sc->cmnd[0]);
-#endif
- rq->end_io(rq, error);
- } else {
-#if 0
- printk("scsi_mq_end_request: Calling blk_mq_end_io for CDB: 0x%02x\n",
- sc->cmnd[0]);
-#endif
- blk_mq_end_io(rq, error);
- }
+ blk_mq_end_io(rq, error);
//FIXME: Need to do equiv of scsi_next_command to kick hctx..?
return NULL;
Thanks for fixing up that bit of ugliness. ;)
Jens, care to review+include Mike's change into your working branch..?
--nab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-20 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-21 19:00 Alexander Gordeev
2013-05-21 19:00 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/1] " Alexander Gordeev
2013-05-21 23:50 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/1] " Tejun Heo
2013-05-22 14:39 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-05-22 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2013-07-11 10:26 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-11 23:00 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-12 7:46 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-13 5:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-16 18:32 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-16 21:38 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-17 16:19 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-18 18:51 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-18 19:12 ` Mike Christie
2013-07-19 0:23 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-19 0:30 ` Jens Axboe
2013-07-19 1:03 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-19 6:34 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-19 15:33 ` James Bottomley
2013-07-19 21:01 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-20 4:56 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-20 14:48 ` Mike Christie
2013-07-20 22:14 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2013-07-20 23:57 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-09 19:15 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-09 20:17 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-08-15 16:23 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-16 2:19 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-08-16 16:41 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-16 17:46 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-08-28 15:56 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-09-20 15:19 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-09-20 20:41 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-10-03 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-07 14:44 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-22 15:03 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-22 21:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-25 10:16 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-25 22:08 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-26 2:09 ` Jens Axboe
2013-07-26 21:14 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-27 0:43 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-29 11:18 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-29 14:08 ` Jens Axboe
2013-07-29 19:19 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-31 4:16 ` Marc C
2013-07-31 10:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 11:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 19:11 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-29 11:46 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-29 14:03 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-09 8:23 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-09 14:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-09 14:24 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-09 15:07 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-09 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-09 16:46 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-08-09 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2013-08-12 15:21 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-29 7:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-07-31 17:11 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-07-19 15:58 ` Mike Christie
2013-07-19 21:05 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-18 19:14 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-07-18 21:21 ` Jens Axboe
2014-09-11 12:42 ` Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-11 12:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Gordeev
2014-09-13 4:43 ` Tejun Heo
2014-09-11 13:36 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/1] " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-09-13 4:46 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374358463.7397.1124.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchristie@fusionio.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®