From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
To: mingo@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] sched: update_top_cache_domain only at the times of building sched domain.
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:44:17 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374594257.5382.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Currently, update_top_cache_domain() is called whenever schedule domain is built or destroyed. But, the following
callpath shows that they're at the same callpath and can be avoided update_top_cache_domain() while destroying schedule
domain and update only at the times of building schedule domains.
partition_sched_domains()
detach_destroy_domain()
cpu_attach_domain()
update_top_cache_domain()
build_sched_domains()
cpu_attach_domain()
update_top_cache_domain()
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b7c32cb..8c6fee4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5102,8 +5102,8 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
* Attach the domain 'sd' to 'cpu' as its base domain. Callers must
* hold the hotplug lock.
*/
-static void
-cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
+static void cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd,
+ int cpu, bool update_cache_domain)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct sched_domain *tmp;
@@ -5138,7 +5138,8 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
rcu_assign_pointer(rq->sd, sd);
destroy_sched_domains(tmp, cpu);
- update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
+ if (update_cache_domain)
+ update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
}
/* cpus with isolated domains */
@@ -6021,7 +6022,7 @@ static int build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
sd = *per_cpu_ptr(d.sd, i);
- cpu_attach_domain(sd, d.rd, i);
+ cpu_attach_domain(sd, d.rd, i, 1);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -6109,7 +6110,7 @@ static void detach_destroy_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map)
- cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i);
+ cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i, 0);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 15:44 Rakib Mullick [this message]
2013-07-23 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-23 16:09 ` Rakib Mullick
2013-07-23 16:20 ` Rakib Mullick
2013-07-23 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-23 17:21 ` Rakib Mullick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374594257.5382.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®