From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753455Ab3GXUDu (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:03:50 -0400 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:49307 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255Ab3GXUDs (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:03:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1374696565.7397.1292.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Subject: Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Andy Grover Cc: target-devel , linux-scsi , Ritesh Raj Sarraf , targetcli-fb-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, linux-kernel Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:09:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <51EF73EF.1040305@redhat.com> References: <51EF73EF.1040305@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:27 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I just wanted to let you know that I finally received permission from > all contributors, and have matched RisingTide's relicensing of targetcli > and its dependencies to Apache 2.0, by relicensing the additional > contributions in the targetcli-fb branch under the same license. > > I'm not quite sure the next steps are, except enjoying all our newly > non-viral source code, but much thanks for getting the ball rolling. > Making this type of announcement without coordinating with us on a plan for moving forward is pretty lame. Especially considering that we've kept asking you privately about how to work together to reconcile -fb with upstream, and your response essentially boiled down to "What's in it for me..?". So if you really, really need an incentive to "do the right thing", how about I start not accept kernel patches from you until you're ready to drop -fb and start working with upstream for real..? --nab