From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>
Cc: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: compile x86_64 waring
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:53:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374742433.29835.31.camel@x61.thuisdomein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F061CC.9080704@ti.com>
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 19:22 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 05:05 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > 3) So this looks like a false positive to me (but I'm not at all
> > familiar with, well, the section mismatch checks). Would there be a way
> > to silence this warning? Other than dropping __initdata from
> > numa_nodes_parsed, of course.
>
> I suspect you have a real problem, in that either numa_nodes_parsed
> needs to not be __initdata (as it's being called by both __init and
> non-__init functions, and hence the problem), or the other caller(s) of
> numa_nodes_parsed need to also be __init. Is this seen in top-of-tree
> Linus?
Won't v3.11-rc2 do?
> If so, I can take a peek took, if someone shoots me a config
> file.
The relevant config options should be CONFIG_NUMA and CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
(both are bool, and set to 'y' in my .config).
But I've just pulled top-of-tree Linus, ie commit 07bc9dc1b0
("git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc'"). I'll
try to build that and I 'll send you my .config if this all is still
triggered.
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 11:56 majianpeng
2013-07-24 21:05 ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-24 23:22 ` Tom Rini
2013-07-25 8:53 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2013-07-25 9:41 ` Paul Bolle
2013-07-25 12:17 ` Tom Rini
2013-10-30 13:04 ` Leon Gorge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374742433.29835.31.camel@x61.thuisdomein \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trini@ti.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®