From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753451Ab3HBWd2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:33:28 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:56359 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751670Ab3HBWd1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:33:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1375482806.2034.140.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [RFC v01 0/3] Power Capping Framework From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:33:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20130802223020.GB28831@kroah.com> References: <1375466932-11842-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <20130802223020.GB28831@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2013-08-03 at 06:30 +0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:08:49AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > Once this framework is approved, we will submit a RAPL client driver using this > > framework. > > Also, given that you work with a lot of kernel developers, I would like > to see their review and signed-off-by: on these patches before you > resend them, please. That way I know that they agree with this > framework as a way for their future changes in this area. Before is a bit hard on public mailing lists isn't it? Shouldn't the reviewed-by/acked-by/signed-off-by's be done after a real patch is submitted? This is just an RFC patchset.