From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755389Ab3HCAZn (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:25:43 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:56688 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744Ab3HCAZm (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:25:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1375489541.2034.151.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [RFC v01 1/3] PowerCap: Documentation From: Joe Perches To: Srinivas Pandruvada Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:25:41 -0700 In-Reply-To: <51FC4D9F.1070302@linux.intel.com> References: <1375466932-11842-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <1375466932-11842-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> <1375488644.2034.150.camel@joe-AO722> <51FC4D9F.1070302@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 17:23 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On 08/02/2013 05:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 11:08 -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > >> Added power cap framework documentation. This explains the use of power capping framework, > >> sys-fs and programming interface. > > [] > Didn't understand this comment. Not a comment, just notation showing skipping a bunch context. > > Given that the ranges seem to be u64s, perhaps the > > lower bounds are too high. Why not nano/pico/fempto > > watts/joules/seconds? > I think they are too small to realistically set a limits on power or > measure. Let's see what others think. No rush.