From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/6] sched: Let arch tell us if sched clock is NMI-safe
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:42:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377103341-15235-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377103341-15235-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
sched_clock() should be fast, scalable and not use any lock. As a
resuly it should be safely called from NMIs.
Now just in case there might be some implementation details proper
to some archs that make sched_clock() not reliable or not safe in NMIs,
lets provide a way through Kconfig for archs to testify about that
support.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
---
arch/Kconfig | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 1feb169..52ad235 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -393,6 +393,11 @@ config HAVE_UNDERSCORE_SYMBOL_PREFIX
Some architectures generate an _ in front of C symbols; things like
module loading and assembly files need to know about this.
+config HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK_NMI
+ bool
+ help
+ Architecture's sched_clock() implementation is safely callable from NMIs.
+
#
# ABI hall of shame
#
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-21 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-21 16:42 [RFC PATCH 0/6] timekeeping: Missing timekeeping update detection Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 16:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-08-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] x86: nsecs to cycles conversion Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 18:26 ` Don Zickus
2013-08-30 10:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] x86: Tell that sched clock is callable in nmi Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] seqlock: Add raw_seqbegin() for non-waiting readers Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] jiffies: Add jiffies_to_nsecs Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 16:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] timekeeping: Debug missing timekeeping updates Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-21 17:25 ` John Stultz
2013-08-30 11:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377103341-15235-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®