From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756217Ab3HWTck (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:32:40 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:51216 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755794Ab3HWTcg (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:32:36 -0400 Message-ID: <1377279064.4147.51.camel@dabdike> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arcmsr: Modify maxium outstanding command From: James Bottomley To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E9=BB=83=E6=B8=85=E9=9A=86?= Cc: linux-scsi , linux-kernel , ching2048@gmai.com In-Reply-To: <1068BE1DEB04498495FD7913A7B2CA53@chingDT> References: <1068BE1DEB04498495FD7913A7B2CA53@chingDT> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:31:04 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 10:52 +0800, 黃清隆 wrote: > From: Ching > > Modify maximum outstanding command number, notify command complete with auto > request sense, reassign ARC12x4 series to SATA type adapter > Signed-off-by: Chingching2048@areca.com.tw That should be Signed-off-by: Ching Shouldn't it? Also, this patch doesn't apply; it doesn't look to be constructed against an upstream version of the driver: patching file drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 51. Hunk #2 FAILED at 705. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h.rej patching file drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 71. Hunk #3 FAILED at 1329. Hunk #4 FAILED at 3313. Hunk #5 succeeded at 3040 with fuzz 2 (offset -670 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 3106 (offset -1780 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 4894. 4 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c.rej James