From: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
<viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <eparis@redhat.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<john.stultz@linaro.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
<jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
<zhangdianfang@huawei.com>, <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
<huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: Fix invalid wakeup in rescuer_thread
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:57:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377784669-28140-14-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377784669-28140-1-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com>
If thread is preempted before calling set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE),
and the other thread set the condition followed with wake_up_process. After
that when this thread is re-scheduled, calling set_current_state to set itself
as state TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, if it is preempted again after that and before
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING), it triggers the invalid wakeup problem.
To solve this problem, using preempt_disable() to bound the operaion that
setting the task state and the conditions(set by the wake thread) validation.
Signed-off-by: Libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 7f5d4be..2dcdd30 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2358,63 +2358,69 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer)
* doesn't participate in concurrency management.
*/
rescuer->task->flags |= PF_WQ_WORKER;
-repeat:
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ for (;;) {
- if (kthread_should_stop()) {
+ if (kthread_should_stop()) {
+ rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (list_empty(&wq->maydays)) {
+ preempt_enable();
+ schedule();
+ preempt_disable();
+ }
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER;
- return 0;
- }
+ preempt_enable();
- /* see whether any pwq is asking for help */
- spin_lock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
+ /* see whether any pwq is asking for help */
+ spin_lock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&wq->maydays)) {
- struct pool_workqueue *pwq = list_first_entry(&wq->maydays,
+ while (!list_empty(&wq->maydays)) {
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq = list_first_entry(&wq->maydays,
struct pool_workqueue, mayday_node);
- struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
- struct work_struct *work, *n;
+ struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
+ struct work_struct *work, *n;
- __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- list_del_init(&pwq->mayday_node);
+ list_del_init(&pwq->mayday_node);
- spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
- /* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
- worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(pool);
- rescuer->pool = pool;
+ /* migrate to the target cpu if possible */
+ worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(pool);
+ rescuer->pool = pool;
- /*
- * Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
- * process'em.
- */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&rescuer->scheduled));
- list_for_each_entry_safe(work, n, &pool->worklist, entry)
- if (get_work_pwq(work) == pwq)
- move_linked_works(work, scheduled, &n);
+ /*
+ * Slurp in all works issued via this workqueue and
+ * process'em.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&rescuer->scheduled));
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(work, n, &pool->worklist, entry)
+ if (get_work_pwq(work) == pwq)
+ move_linked_works(work, scheduled, &n);
- process_scheduled_works(rescuer);
+ process_scheduled_works(rescuer);
- /*
- * Leave this pool. If keep_working() is %true, notify a
- * regular worker; otherwise, we end up with 0 concurrency
- * and stalling the execution.
- */
- if (keep_working(pool))
- wake_up_worker(pool);
+ /*
+ * Leave this pool. If keep_working() is %true, notify a
+ * regular worker; otherwise, we end up with 0 concurrency
+ * and stalling the execution.
+ */
+ if (keep_working(pool))
+ wake_up_worker(pool);
- rescuer->pool = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
- spin_lock(&wq_mayday_lock);
- }
+ rescuer->pool = NULL;
+ spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_lock(&wq_mayday_lock);
+ }
- spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock);
- /* rescuers should never participate in concurrency management */
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rescuer->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING));
- schedule();
- goto repeat;
+ /* rescuers should never participate in concurrency management */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rescuer->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING));
+ }
}
struct wq_barrier {
--
1.8.2.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 13:57 [PATCH 00/14] Fix bug about invalid wake up problem Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 01/14] kthread: Fix invalid wakeup in kthreadd Libin
2013-08-30 0:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 02/14] audit: Fix invalid wakeup in kauditd_thread Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 03/14] audit: Fix invalid wakeup in wait_for_auditd Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 04/14] exit: Fix invalid wakeup in do_wait Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 05/14] hrtimer: Fix invalid wakeup in do_nanosleep Libin
2013-09-12 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 06/14] irq: Fix invalid wakeup in irq_wait_for_interrupt Libin
2013-09-12 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 07/14] module: Fix invalid wakeup in wait_for_zero_refcount Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 08/14] namespace: Fix invalid wakeup in zap_pid_ns_processes Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 09/14] rcutree: Fix invalid wakeup in rcu_wait Libin
2013-08-30 0:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 10/14] time: Fix invalid wakeup in alarmtimer_do_nsleep Libin
2013-09-12 13:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 11/14] trace: Fix invalid wakeup in wait_to_die Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 12/14] trace: Fix invalid wakeup in ring_buffer_consumer_thread Libin
2013-08-29 13:57 ` Libin [this message]
2013-08-29 13:57 ` [PATCH 14/14] klist: Fix invalid wakeup in klist_remove Libin
2013-08-29 14:08 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix bug about invalid wake up problem Libin
2013-08-29 14:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-29 14:10 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-29 23:39 ` Libin
2013-08-30 0:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377784669-28140-14-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--to=huawei.libin@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangdianfang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®