mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, pjt@google.com,
	preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, aswin@hp.com,
	scott.norton@hp.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting idle balance
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:05:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377806736-3752-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> (raw)

These patches modify and add to the way we limit idle balancing. The first
patch reduces the chance we overestimate the avg_idle guestimator. The second
patch makes idle balance compare the avg_idle with the max cost we ever spend
on a new idle load balance per sched domain to limit idle balance. 

The third is an RFC patch which periodically decays each domain's max
newidle balance costs and compares avg_idle sd with max newidle balance +
sched_migration_cost to determine if we should skip balancing.

These changes further reduce the chance we attempt idle balancing when the time
a CPU remains idle is short and is not more than the cost to do the balancing.

The first 2 patches provide good performance boosts of many AIM7 workloads on an
8 socket (80 core) machine. The table below compares the average jobs per minute
at 10-100, 200-1000, and 1100-2000 users between the vanilla 3.11-rc7 kernel and
the 3.11-rc7 kernel with the first 2 patches with Hyperthreading enabled.

----------------------------------------------------------------
workload     | % improvement   | % improvement  | % improvement
             | with patch      | with patch     | with patch
             | 1100-2000 users | 200-1000 users | 10-100 users
----------------------------------------------------------------
alltests     | +12.2%          |  +7.5%         |  +1.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------
compute      |  -0.6%          |  -0.8%         |  +0.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------
custom       | +24.0%          | +25.03         | +16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------
disk         | +11.6%          | +21.3%         |  +0.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------
fserver      | +74.7%          | +34.7%         |  -2.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------
high_systime | +21.2%          | +10.5%         |  +0.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------
new_fserver  | +59.8%          | +23.7%         |  -1.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------
shared       |  +9.0%          | +13.0%         |  +6.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------

Jason Low (3):
  sched: Reduce overestimating rq->avg_idle
  sched: Consider max cost of idle balance per sched domain
  sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance

 arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h |    2 +
 include/linux/sched.h             |    4 +++
 include/linux/topology.h          |    6 ++++
 kernel/sched/core.c               |   10 ++++---
 kernel/sched/fair.c               |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h              |    3 ++
 6 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2013-08-29 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-29 20:05 Jason Low [this message]
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: Reduce overestimating rq->avg_idle Jason Low
2013-09-02  6:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: Consider max cost of idle balance per sched domain Jason Low
2013-08-30  9:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-02  6:54   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-09-03 21:06     ` Jason Low
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance Jason Low
2013-08-30 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-30 10:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-04  6:02       ` Jason Low
2013-09-09 11:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 20:40           ` Jason Low
2013-09-04  7:10     ` Jason Low
2013-09-09 11:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 21:07         ` Jason Low
2013-09-10  1:40           ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-12 10:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting " Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1377806736-3752-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®