From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, jason.low2@hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, pjt@google.com,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, aswin@hp.com,
scott.norton@hp.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting idle balance
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:05:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377806736-3752-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> (raw)
These patches modify and add to the way we limit idle balancing. The first
patch reduces the chance we overestimate the avg_idle guestimator. The second
patch makes idle balance compare the avg_idle with the max cost we ever spend
on a new idle load balance per sched domain to limit idle balance.
The third is an RFC patch which periodically decays each domain's max
newidle balance costs and compares avg_idle sd with max newidle balance +
sched_migration_cost to determine if we should skip balancing.
These changes further reduce the chance we attempt idle balancing when the time
a CPU remains idle is short and is not more than the cost to do the balancing.
The first 2 patches provide good performance boosts of many AIM7 workloads on an
8 socket (80 core) machine. The table below compares the average jobs per minute
at 10-100, 200-1000, and 1100-2000 users between the vanilla 3.11-rc7 kernel and
the 3.11-rc7 kernel with the first 2 patches with Hyperthreading enabled.
----------------------------------------------------------------
workload | % improvement | % improvement | % improvement
| with patch | with patch | with patch
| 1100-2000 users | 200-1000 users | 10-100 users
----------------------------------------------------------------
alltests | +12.2% | +7.5% | +1.0%
----------------------------------------------------------------
compute | -0.6% | -0.8% | +0.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------
custom | +24.0% | +25.03 | +16.4%
----------------------------------------------------------------
disk | +11.6% | +21.3% | +0.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------
fserver | +74.7% | +34.7% | -2.7%
----------------------------------------------------------------
high_systime | +21.2% | +10.5% | +0.6%
----------------------------------------------------------------
new_fserver | +59.8% | +23.7% | -1.2%
----------------------------------------------------------------
shared | +9.0% | +13.0% | +6.5%
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Low (3):
sched: Reduce overestimating rq->avg_idle
sched: Consider max cost of idle balance per sched domain
sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance
arch/metag/include/asm/topology.h | 2 +
include/linux/sched.h | 4 +++
include/linux/topology.h | 6 ++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 3 ++
6 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 20:05 Jason Low [this message]
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] sched: Reduce overestimating rq->avg_idle Jason Low
2013-09-02 6:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] sched: Consider max cost of idle balance per sched domain Jason Low
2013-08-30 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-02 6:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-09-03 21:06 ` Jason Low
2013-08-29 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH v4 3/3] sched: Periodically decay max cost of idle balance Jason Low
2013-08-30 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-30 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-04 6:02 ` Jason Low
2013-09-09 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 20:40 ` Jason Low
2013-09-04 7:10 ` Jason Low
2013-09-09 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 21:07 ` Jason Low
2013-09-10 1:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-09-12 10:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] sched: Limiting " Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1377806736-3752-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®