From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753406Ab3IJMw2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:52:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-f171.google.com ([209.85.215.171]:56260 "EHLO mail-ea0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752739Ab3IJMuU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:50:20 -0400 From: Lee Jones To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jic23@cam.ac.uk Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@linaro.org, denis.ciocca@st.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones Subject: [PATCH 33/38] iio: accel-core: st: Give some indication if device probing was successful Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:49:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1378817379-8238-34-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2 In-Reply-To: <1378817379-8238-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1378817379-8238-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At the moment the driver is silent in some error cases and if successful. Prior to this patch there was no clear way to know if the driver succeeded or not without looking deep into sysfs. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_core.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_core.c index 03a2b6b..a003f3b 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_core.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/st_accel_core.c @@ -496,6 +496,9 @@ int st_accel_common_probe(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, if (err && irq > 0) goto st_accel_device_register_error; + if (!err) + dev_info(&indio_dev->dev, "Successfully registered\n"); + return err; st_accel_device_register_error: -- 1.8.1.2