From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:39:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1380029973.21505.42.camel@i7.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924131621.GC5150@8bytes.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 15:16 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> I am not convinced that this is the right approach. If a device wasn't
> translated by VT-d in the old kernel doesn't mean it will not be
> translated in the new kernel. How about unconditionally resetting all
> PCI busses and/or functions here before IOMMU initialization proceeds?
Forget the IOMMU.
If a device is doing DMA in the old kernel, and *continues* doing DMA
under the new kernel, surely something ought to shut it down?
It's the generic kexec or machine_shutdown code which should be doing
this, not IOMMU code. *Especially* not Intel-specific IOMMU code. It
does not live here.
If anything, the IOMMU gives you a way to *survive* this kind of thing
and means that you might get away without quiescing devices when
otherwise you would have died.
--
dwmw2
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5745 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 6:09 Takao Indoh
2013-09-18 9:03 ` Baoquan He
2013-09-24 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-09-24 13:39 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1380029973.21505.42.camel@i7.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®