mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, steve.capper@linaro.org, nico@linaro.org,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com, dsaxena@linaro.org,
	jiang.liu@huawei.com, Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] arm64: support single-step and breakpoint handler hooks
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:47:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382008671-4515-2-git-send-email-sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382008671-4515-1-git-send-email-sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>

AArch64 Single Steping and Breakpoint debug exceptions will be
used by multiple debug framworks like kprobes & kgdb.

This patch implements the hooks for those frameworks to register
their own handlers for handling breakpoint and single step events.

Reworked the debug exception handler in entry.S: do_dbg to route
software breakpoint (BRK64) exception to do_debug_exception()

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 21 ++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S               |  2 +
 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
index a2232d0..6231479 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
@@ -62,6 +62,27 @@ struct task_struct;
 
 #define DBG_ARCH_ID_RESERVED	0	/* In case of ptrace ABI updates. */
 
+#define DBG_HOOK_HANDLED	0
+#define DBG_HOOK_ERROR		1
+
+struct step_hook {
+	struct list_head node;
+	int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+};
+
+void register_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook);
+void unregister_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook);
+
+struct break_hook {
+	struct list_head node;
+	u32 esr_val;
+	u32 esr_mask;
+	int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr);
+};
+
+void register_break_hook(struct break_hook *hook);
+void unregister_break_hook(struct break_hook *hook);
+
 u8 debug_monitors_arch(void);
 
 void enable_debug_monitors(enum debug_el el);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index cbfacf7..e42ad5f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -188,6 +188,48 @@ static void clear_regs_spsr_ss(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	regs->pstate = spsr;
 }
 
+/* EL1 Single Step Handler hooks */
+static LIST_HEAD(step_hook);
+DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
+
+void register_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
+{
+	write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+	list_add(&hook->node, &step_hook);
+	write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+}
+
+void unregister_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
+{
+	write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+	list_del(&hook->node);
+	write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Call registered single step handers
+ * There is no Syndrome info to check for determining the handler.
+ * So we call all the registered handlers, until the right handler is
+ * found which returns zero.
+ */
+static int call_step_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	struct step_hook *hook;
+	int retval = DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
+
+	read_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(hook, &step_hook, node)	{
+		retval = hook->fn(regs, esr);
+		if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	read_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+
+	return retval;
+}
+
 static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 			       struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -215,7 +257,10 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 		 */
 		user_rewind_single_step(current);
 	} else {
-		/* TODO: route to KGDB */
+		/* call registered single step handlers */
+		if (call_step_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
+			return 0;
+
 		pr_warning("Unexpected kernel single-step exception at EL1\n");
 		/*
 		 * Re-enable stepping since we know that we will be
@@ -227,11 +272,50 @@ static int single_step_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+
+static LIST_HEAD(break_hook);
+DEFINE_RWLOCK(break_hook_lock);
+
+void register_break_hook(struct break_hook *hook)
+{
+	write_lock(&break_hook_lock);
+	list_add(&hook->node, &break_hook);
+	write_unlock(&break_hook_lock);
+}
+
+void unregister_break_hook(struct break_hook *hook)
+{
+	write_lock(&break_hook_lock);
+	list_del(&hook->node);
+	write_unlock(&break_hook_lock);
+}
+
+static int call_break_hook(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
+{
+	struct break_hook *hook;
+	int (*fn)(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr) = NULL;
+
+	read_lock(&break_hook_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(hook, &break_hook, node)
+		if ((esr & hook->esr_mask) == hook->esr_val)
+			fn = hook->fn;
+	read_unlock(&break_hook_lock);
+
+	return fn ? fn(regs, esr) : DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
+}
+
 static int brk_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
 		       struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	siginfo_t info;
 
+	/* call the registered breakpoint handler */
+	if (call_break_hook(regs, esr) == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
+		return 0;
+
+	pr_warn("unexpected brk exception at %lx, esr=0x%x\n",
+			(long)instruction_pointer(regs), esr);
+
 	if (!user_mode(regs))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 3881fd1..7fbc510 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ el1_dbg:
 	/*
 	 * Debug exception handling
 	 */
+	cmp	x24, #ESR_EL1_EC_BRK64		// if BRK64
+	cinc	x24, x24, eq			// set bit '0'
 	tbz	x24, #0, el1_inv		// EL1 only
 	mrs	x0, far_el1
 	mov	x2, sp				// struct pt_regs
-- 
1.8.1.2


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-17 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-17 11:17 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu [this message]
2013-10-25 15:22   ` [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] arm64: support single-step and breakpoint handler hooks Will Deacon
2013-12-03 14:33     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-03 19:44       ` Will Deacon
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 16:56   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-09  9:10     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11  5:39       ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11  7:54         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:51           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:58             ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 17:32               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12  6:23                 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12  7:27                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12  8:44                     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 10:17                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 10:55                         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 14:11                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 16:59                           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-13 16:05                             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13  6:55                     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13  7:08                       ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 14:07                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 14:31                       ` Will Deacon
2013-11-13 15:55                         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:39                           ` Will Deacon
2013-11-18  6:55                             ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18  8:51                               ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 13:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-13 14:20                 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11  5:35     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 11:21       ` Will Deacon
2013-11-12  6:52         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:37           ` Will Deacon
2013-11-18  6:43             ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] arm64: Kprobes instruction simulation support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:03   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11  5:58     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes) Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:04   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11  4:29     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11  7:53       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2013-11-11  8:55         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] arm64: Enable kprobes support for arm64 platform Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kprobes: Add cases for arm and arm64 in sample module Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-25 15:24   ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 11:05     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-18  8:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-21  4:17   ` Sandeepa Prabhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1382008671-4515-2-git-send-email-sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --to=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dsaxena@linaro.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®