From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] dma: cppi41: redo descriptor collection in abort case
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:14:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382436846-9057-4-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382436846-9057-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Most of the logic here is try and error since what actually happens does
not match the trm or I miss read it.
My first assumption was that the queue on which the tear-down descriptor
completes (their own complete queue vs "active descriptor" complete
queue) depends on the transfer direction. This seems not to be true
because I manage to trigger
| WARN_ON(c->desc_phys != desc_phys);
and the other few were fine means the tear-down descriptor was valid but
on different queue.
This patch changes the logic here to look on both queues for the
descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/dma/cppi41.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/cppi41.c b/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
index 42d1c58..561de4f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
@@ -563,36 +563,26 @@ static int cppi41_tear_down_chan(struct cppi41_channel *c)
c->td_retry = 100;
}
- if (!c->td_seen) {
- unsigned td_comp_queue;
+ if (!c->td_seen || !c->td_desc_seen) {
- if (c->is_tx)
- td_comp_queue = cdd->td_queue.complete;
- else
- td_comp_queue = c->q_comp_num;
+ desc_phys = cppi41_pop_desc(cdd, cdd->td_queue.complete);
+ if (!desc_phys)
+ desc_phys = cppi41_pop_desc(cdd, c->q_comp_num);
- desc_phys = cppi41_pop_desc(cdd, td_comp_queue);
- if (desc_phys) {
- __iormb();
+ if (desc_phys == c->desc_phys) {
+ c->td_desc_seen = 1;
+
+ } else if (desc_phys == td_desc_phys) {
+ u32 pd0;
- if (desc_phys == td_desc_phys) {
- u32 pd0;
- pd0 = td->pd0;
- WARN_ON((pd0 >> DESC_TYPE) != DESC_TYPE_TEARD);
- WARN_ON(!c->is_tx && !(pd0 & TD_DESC_IS_RX));
- WARN_ON((pd0 & 0x1f) != c->port_num);
- } else {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- }
- c->td_seen = 1;
- }
- }
- if (!c->td_desc_seen) {
- desc_phys = cppi41_pop_desc(cdd, c->q_comp_num);
- if (desc_phys) {
__iormb();
- WARN_ON(c->desc_phys != desc_phys);
- c->td_desc_seen = 1;
+ pd0 = td->pd0;
+ WARN_ON((pd0 >> DESC_TYPE) != DESC_TYPE_TEARD);
+ WARN_ON(!c->is_tx && !(pd0 & TD_DESC_IS_RX));
+ WARN_ON((pd0 & 0x1f) != c->port_num);
+ c->td_seen = 1;
+ } else if (desc_phys) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
}
c->td_retry--;
--
1.8.4.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-22 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-22 10:14 cppi41: pending patches Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] dma: cppi41: restore more registers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 10:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] dma: cppi41: use cppi41_pop_desc() where possible Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-10-22 10:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-10-22 10:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] dma: cppi41: return code > 0 of pm_runtime_get_sync() is not an error Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-12 8:59 ` cppi41: pending patches Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382436846-9057-4-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®