From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: <rnayak@ti.com>, <khilman@linaro.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: maintain sane runtime pm status around suspend/resume
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:08:30 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384297710-29694-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (raw)
OMAP device hooks around suspend|resume_noirq ensures that hwmod
devices are forced to idle using omap_device_idle/enable as part of
the last stage of suspend activity.
For a device such as i2c who uses autosuspend, it is possible to enter
the suspend path with dev->power.runtime_status = RPM_ACTIVE.
As part of the suspend flow, the generic runtime logic would increment
it's dev->power.disable_depth to 1. This should prevent further
pm_runtime_get_sync from succeeding once the runtime_status has been
set to RPM_SUSPENDED.
Now, as part of the suspend_noirq handler in omap_device, we force the
following: if the device status is !suspended, we force the device
to idle using omap_device_idle (clocks are cut etc..). This ensures
that from a hardware perspective, the device is "suspended". However,
runtime_status is left to be active.
*if* an operation is attempted after this point to
pm_runtime_get_sync, runtime framework depends on runtime_status to
indicate accurately the device status, and since it sees it to be
ACTIVE, it assumes the module is functional and returns a non-error
value. As a result the user will see pm_runtime_get succeed, however a
register access will crash due to the lack of clocks.
To prevent this from happening, we should ensure that runtime_status
exactly indicates the device status. As a result of this change
any further calls to pm_runtime_get* would return -EACCES (since
disable_depth is 1). On resume, we restore the clocks and runtime
status exactly as we suspended with.
Reported-by: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
---
Changes in V2 (resend):
- dropped the unnecessary flag for runtime status restore
- picked up kevin's ack from https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3168371/
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3154501/
patch baseline: V3.12 tag (also applies on linux-next next-20131107 tag)
Logs from 3.12 based vendor kernel:
Before: http://pastebin.com/m5KxnB7a
After: http://pastebin.com/8AfX4e7r
The discussion on cpufreq side of the story which triggered this scenario:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=138263811321921&w=2
Tested on TI vendor kernel (with dt boot):
AM335x: evm, BBB, sk, BBW
OMAP5uEVM, DRA7-evm
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
index b69dd9a..f97b34b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c
@@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static int _od_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
if (!ret && !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
if (pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev) == 0) {
+ pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
omap_device_idle(pdev);
od->flags |= OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
}
@@ -634,10 +635,10 @@ static int _od_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct omap_device *od = to_omap_device(pdev);
- if ((od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) &&
- !pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
+ if (od->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED) {
od->flags &= ~OMAP_DEVICE_SUSPENDED;
omap_device_enable(pdev);
+ pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
}
--
1.7.9.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 23:08 Nishanth Menon [this message]
2013-11-13 12:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-11-13 14:56 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-11-13 15:20 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-11-13 15:28 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-11-13 15:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-11-13 16:19 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-11-14 17:05 ` [PATCH V3] " Nishanth Menon
2013-11-14 18:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-11-14 19:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-11-15 8:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-11-15 13:30 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-11-15 14:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-11-15 20:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-11-15 22:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-11-19 11:34 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1384297710-29694-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®