mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: David Decotigny <decot@googlers.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: avoid use of reclaimed reference
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:46:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1384325202.3149.8.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG88wWZyodGU7AmTX=wYWn5igr-ySm_HLs0uA1iO+Fxq3msRnA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 18:09 -0800, David Decotigny wrote:
> I was considering the following scenario wherein the "if
> (scsi_device_created(sdev))" test at the end would test garbage at
> best (or unmapped data):

Well, no, the counting isn't right:

>        if (!(sdev = scsi_device_lookup_by_target(starget, 0))) {  // not found
>                sdev = scsi_alloc_sdev(starget, 0, NULL);    // -> ref cnt = 2

1

>                if (scsi_device_get(sdev)) {  // -> ref cnt = 3

2

>                }
>                ...
>        }
>       ...
>                        res = scsi_probe_and_add_lun(starget,    // ->
> ref cnt = 1

No idea what you think here, where were the other puts?  If starget,lun
is sdev, then the count goes to 3 here otherwise it stays at 2 if it
isn't reported in the scan.
      ...
>        scsi_device_put(sdev);  // -> reclaimed

No, it goes to either 2 or 1 here.  If it goes to 1 it's because the
sdev was never probed and thus it remains in the created state.

>        if (scsi_device_created(sdev))  // test on garbage or unmapped data (#PF)

Which means this test passes and it gets garbage collected by
__scsi_remove_device().  Otherwise we exit with refcount 2.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1384304973.git.decot@googlers.com>
2013-11-13  1:10 ` David Decotigny
2013-11-13  1:57   ` James Bottomley
2013-11-13  2:09     ` David Decotigny
2013-11-13  6:46       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2013-11-13 12:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2013-11-14  2:50     ` David Decotigny
2013-11-14  6:15       ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1384325202.3149.8.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=decot@googlers.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®