From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753405Ab3KOTHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:07:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:53956 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752350Ab3KOTHL (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:07:11 -0500 From: Grant Likely To: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] Kobjectify device tree structures Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:46:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1384537604-5032-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I've resurrected this series and am posting it for review. I think I've got the last problem that I know about solved. That was the problem that Nathan pointed out that modified properties don't get reflected in the sysfs representation. As I mentioned the last time I posted this series, I will probably put a kernel release between patches 1&2 and patch 3 so that if there is any problems then the old /proc method is still available. I'm posting this for review, but I've only compile tested on ARM and PowerPC, and boot tested on ARM. I'll be going though a full set of builds when I'm no longer on an airplane. :-) The existing device-tree userspace ABI remains the same with this series applied. Nathan, I would particularly appreciate if you can test this on PowerPC machines with OF_DYNAMIC. g.