From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754518Ab3KUNlN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:41:13 -0500 Received: from hqemgate15.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.64]:6062 "EHLO hqemgate15.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079Ab3KUNlK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:41:10 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Thu, 21 Nov 2013 05:35:08 -0800 From: Hiroshi Doyu To: , , , , , , CC: Hiroshi Doyu , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCHv6 01/13] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args() Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:40:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1385041249-7705-2-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.5 In-Reply-To: <1385041249-7705-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> References: <1385041249-7705-1-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following pattern of code is tempting to add a new member for of_property_for_each_*() family as an idiom. for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++) ; Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu --- v5: New patch for v5. --- include/linux/of.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h index 276c546..131fef5 100644 --- a/include/linux/of.h +++ b/include/linux/of.h @@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct device_node *np, s; \ s = of_prop_next_string(prop, s)) +#define of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args) \ + for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++) + #if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE) extern void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *, struct proc_dir_entry *); extern void proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct property *prop); -- 1.8.1.5