From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755894Ab3KVWpY (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:45:24 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0194.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.194]:39304 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755338Ab3KVWpW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:45:22 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:967:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1566:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3870:3871:3876:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4321:4362:5007:7652:7875:9025:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: vase57_2ea9fe9bef729 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1175 Message-ID: <1385160319.17856.35.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch.pl: Check for functions without a real prototype From: Joe Perches To: Elena Ufimtseva Cc: apw@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:45:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1385158664-12923-1-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> References: <1385158664-12923-1-git-send-email-ufimtseva@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 17:17 -0500, Elena Ufimtseva wrote: > Based on Richard Weinberger patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/16/510 > Functions like this one are evil: > > void foo() > { > ... > } [] > - added white space in regular expression between (), based > on comments from Joe Perches. Thanks Elena, but this is already applied in -next.