From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754501Ab3K0HtC (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:49:02 -0500 Received: from mail.precitec.de ([85.115.17.50]:43900 "EHLO mail.precitec.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752003Ab3K0HtA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:49:00 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 309 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:49:00 EST X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0207.5295A2AC.0081,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 From: Bockholdt Arne To: Len Brown CC: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_idle: Fixed C6 state on Avoton/Rangeley processors Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] intel_idle: Fixed C6 state on Avoton/Rangeley processors Thread-Index: AQHO6qzIhv1XjUFGzUekxvfzDKdTiJo3yKgAgADaAIA= Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:43:39 +0000 Message-ID: <1385538219.4577.5.camel@po-d-abo-ubu> References: <1385450037.4588.10.camel@po-d-abo-ubu> <1574800.Vl6NB1rGSk@amdc1032> <1385473105.4588.14.camel@po-d-abo-ubu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.201.50] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <63FD2D67C3C59C43AF9BC7204AEA0934@precitecgroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id rAR7nFg1019490 On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 13:43 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > .desc = "MWAIT 0x51", > > - .flags = MWAIT2flg(0x58) | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED, > > + .flags = MWAIT2flg(0x51) | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED, > > .exit_latency = 15, > > .target_residency = 45, > > Thanks for noticing that .desc and .flags are inconsistent. > This is my fault -- apparently I e-mailed a version of this patch that > is older than what I have in my git tree. > > No big issue, though, as 0x51 and 0x58 do exactly the same thing in > AVN hardware. > Indeed, changing .desc to 0x58 would be fine also. The Rangeley on my Supermicro A1SRi-2758F board won't enter C6 with MWAIT flag set to 0x58 but will do that with 0x51. Maybe the missing turbo mode of the Rangeley ? Arne {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I