mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:32:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385569457-8650-2-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 16:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> 
> Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say
> we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check
> for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator
> support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 02fdf925bb56..d85f31385b24 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>  
>  static bool have_full_constraints(void)
>  {
> -	return has_full_constraints;
> +	return has_full_constraints || of_have_populated_dt();
>  }
>  
>  /**

Doesn't this now make this code in regulator_init_complete()
redundant..?

	if (of_have_populated_dt())
		has_full_constraints = true;

Or is keeping this to avoid one less variable check a worthwhile
optimisation?

-- 
Tixy


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-27 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-27 16:24 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:32   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-11-27 16:53     ` Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:55   ` Fabio Estevam
2013-11-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home \
    --to=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@linaro.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome