From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:32:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385569457-8650-2-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 16:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
>
> Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say
> we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check
> for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator
> support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 02fdf925bb56..d85f31385b24 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static const char *rdev_get_name(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>
> static bool have_full_constraints(void)
> {
> - return has_full_constraints;
> + return has_full_constraints || of_have_populated_dt();
> }
>
> /**
Doesn't this now make this code in regulator_init_complete()
redundant..?
if (of_have_populated_dt())
has_full_constraints = true;
Or is keeping this to avoid one less variable check a worthwhile
optimisation?
--
Tixy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-27 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 16:24 [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:32 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-11-27 16:53 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-27 16:55 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-11-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1385569979.32005.2.camel@linaro1.home \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@linaro.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome