From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162526Ab3LFNoo (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:44:44 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:44197 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758213Ab3LFNCc (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:02:32 -0500 From: Luis Henriques To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: Thomas Hellstrom , Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH 3.11 135/272] drm/ttm: Fix memory type compatibility check Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:57:04 +0000 Message-Id: <1386334761-25517-136-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1386334761-25517-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> References: <1386334761-25517-1-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.11.10.1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Thomas Hellstrom commit 59c8e66378fb78adbcd05f0d09783dde6fef282b upstream. Also check the busy placements before deciding to move a buffer object. Failing to do this may result in a completely unneccessary move within a single memory type. Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index cb9dd67..eb96c21 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -993,24 +993,32 @@ out_unlock: return ret; } -static int ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement, - struct ttm_mem_reg *mem) +static bool ttm_bo_mem_compat(struct ttm_placement *placement, + struct ttm_mem_reg *mem, + uint32_t *new_flags) { int i; if (mem->mm_node && placement->lpfn != 0 && (mem->start < placement->fpfn || mem->start + mem->num_pages > placement->lpfn)) - return -1; + return false; for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; i++) { - if ((placement->placement[i] & mem->placement & - TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) && - (placement->placement[i] & mem->placement & - TTM_PL_MASK_MEM)) - return i; + *new_flags = placement->placement[i]; + if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) && + (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM)) + return true; + } + + for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; i++) { + *new_flags = placement->busy_placement[i]; + if ((*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING) && + (*new_flags & mem->placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM)) + return true; } - return -1; + + return false; } int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, @@ -1019,6 +1027,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool no_wait_gpu) { int ret; + uint32_t new_flags; lockdep_assert_held(&bo->resv->lock.base); /* Check that range is valid */ @@ -1029,8 +1038,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, /* * Check whether we need to move buffer. */ - ret = ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem); - if (ret < 0) { + if (!ttm_bo_mem_compat(placement, &bo->mem, &new_flags)) { ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, interruptible, no_wait_gpu); if (ret) @@ -1040,7 +1048,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, * Use the access and other non-mapping-related flag bits from * the compatible memory placement flags to the active flags */ - ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, placement->placement[ret], + ttm_flag_masked(&bo->mem.placement, new_flags, ~TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE); } /* -- 1.8.3.2