From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162748Ab3LFXwL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:52:11 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:48386 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161297Ab3LFXMg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:36 -0500 From: Kamal Mostafa To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com Cc: David Howells , David Woodhouse , Rusty Russell , Josh Boyer , Alexander Holler , Kamal Mostafa Subject: [PATCH 3.8 007/152] X.509: Remove certificate date checks Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:08:51 -0800 Message-Id: <1386371476-2477-8-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1386371476-2477-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> References: <1386371476-2477-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com> X-Extended-Stable: 3.8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.8.13.14 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: David Howells commit 124df926090b32a998483f6e43ebeccdbe5b5302 upstream. Remove the certificate date checks that are performed when a certificate is parsed. There are two checks: a valid from and a valid to. The first check is causing a lot of problems with system clocks that don't keep good time and the second places an implicit expiry date upon the kernel when used for module signing, so do we really need them? Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: David Woodhouse cc: Rusty Russell cc: Josh Boyer cc: Alexander Holler [ kamal: backport to 3.8 (context) ] Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c | 38 -------------------------------- 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c index 06007f0..52222a2 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/x509_public_key.c @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ error_no_sig: static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep) { struct x509_certificate *cert; - struct tm now; size_t srlen, sulen; char *desc = NULL; int ret; @@ -137,43 +136,6 @@ static int x509_key_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep) goto error_free_cert; } - time_to_tm(CURRENT_TIME.tv_sec, 0, &now); - pr_devel("Now: %04ld-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", - now.tm_year + 1900, now.tm_mon + 1, now.tm_mday, - now.tm_hour, now.tm_min, now.tm_sec); - if (now.tm_year < cert->valid_from.tm_year || - (now.tm_year == cert->valid_from.tm_year && - (now.tm_mon < cert->valid_from.tm_mon || - (now.tm_mon == cert->valid_from.tm_mon && - (now.tm_mday < cert->valid_from.tm_mday || - (now.tm_mday == cert->valid_from.tm_mday && - (now.tm_hour < cert->valid_from.tm_hour || - (now.tm_hour == cert->valid_from.tm_hour && - (now.tm_min < cert->valid_from.tm_min || - (now.tm_min == cert->valid_from.tm_min && - (now.tm_sec < cert->valid_from.tm_sec - ))))))))))) { - pr_warn("Cert %s is not yet valid\n", cert->fingerprint); - ret = -EKEYREJECTED; - goto error_free_cert; - } - if (now.tm_year > cert->valid_to.tm_year || - (now.tm_year == cert->valid_to.tm_year && - (now.tm_mon > cert->valid_to.tm_mon || - (now.tm_mon == cert->valid_to.tm_mon && - (now.tm_mday > cert->valid_to.tm_mday || - (now.tm_mday == cert->valid_to.tm_mday && - (now.tm_hour > cert->valid_to.tm_hour || - (now.tm_hour == cert->valid_to.tm_hour && - (now.tm_min > cert->valid_to.tm_min || - (now.tm_min == cert->valid_to.tm_min && - (now.tm_sec > cert->valid_to.tm_sec - ))))))))))) { - pr_warn("Cert %s has expired\n", cert->fingerprint); - ret = -EKEYEXPIRED; - goto error_free_cert; - } - cert->pub->algo = x509_public_key_algorithms[cert->pkey_algo]; cert->pub->id_type = PKEY_ID_X509; -- 1.8.3.2