From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755408Ab3LGPYO (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:24:14 -0500 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.9]:49437 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews06.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754840Ab3LGPYM (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Dec 2013 10:24:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1386429849.9737.7.camel@x41.thuisdomein> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate From: Paul Bolle To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Cc: Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nishanth Menon , Stephen Warren , Kgene Kim , linux-samsung-soc , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, jinchoi@broadcom.com, Lan Tianyu , Sebastian Capella , Jonghwan Choi Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:24:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87vbz0j55p.fsf@nemi.mork.no> References: <28d493f20239a242a7b26dfe1efed40d83bf1e10.1385523340.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <3057132.zHNVNQZ8pP@vostro.rjw.lan> <1781198.iCUX9ZdW7W@vostro.rjw.lan> <87vbz0j55p.fsf@nemi.mork.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2013 15:24:10.0392 (UTC) FILETIME=[60A15980:01CEF360] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 12:01 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Sorry to be making noise here again, but I was eager to verify that the > fixes in v3.13-rc3 were OK on my system. Unfortunately it seems this > patch completely broke suspend for me. Hibernete ended up with a blank > console and no visible activity, without ever writing any image to disk. > > There really weren't that many suspects between v3.13-rc2 and v3.13-rc3, > so I went directly to reverting 5a87182aa21d ("cpufreq: suspend > governors on system suspend/hibernate") which fixed the problem. I > didn't bother debugging it further from there. I don't think there is > anything magic about my system which should make this problem specific > to it. > > I am still using the acpi-cpufreq driver on an old x86_64 laptop if that > matters. On an x86 (32 bits) laptop hibernate also broke in v3.13-rc3. On that machine hibernation itself worked, or at least seemed to work, but the machine would basically stop after thawing (directly after loading the hibernation image). And reverting commit 5a87182aa21d ("cpufreq: suspend governors on system suspend/hibernate"), on top of v3.13-rc3, also lead to a successful hibernation/thaw cycle. Paul Bolle