From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760129Ab3LIAls (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:41:48 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:40569 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760070Ab3LIAlr (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:41:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1386549703.4477.8.camel@concordia> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: New conditional branch filter From: Michael Ellerman To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Anshuman Khandual Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:41:43 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20131206131817.GB2279@ghostprotocols.net> References: <1386153162-11225-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1386218874.6009.7.camel@concordia> <20131206131817.GB2279@ghostprotocols.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 10:18 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 03:47:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 16:02 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > This patchset is the re-spin of the original branch stack sampling > > > patchset which introduced new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter. This patchset > > > also enables SW based branch filtering support for book3s powerpc platforms which > > > have PMU HW backed branch stack sampling support. > > > > > > Summary of code changes in this patchset: > > > > > > (1) Introduces a new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND branch filter > > > (2) Add the "cond" branch filter options in the "perf record" tool > > > (3) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in X86 platforms > > > (4) Enable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND in POWER8 platform > > > (5) Update the documentation regarding "perf record" tool > > > > > > Hi Arnaldo, > > > > Can you please take just patches 1-5 into the perf tree? And do you mind > > putting them in a topic branch so Benh can merge that. > > This is mostly kernel code, I process the userspace ones, so I think either > Ingo or PeterZ should pick these, Ingo, Peter? Urgh, sorry. MAINTAINERS just lists all of you in a block. Added PeterZ to CC. Peter/Ingo can you please take just patches 1-5 into the perf tree? And do you mind putting them in a topic branch so Benh can merge that. The generic & x86 changes have a Reviewed-by from Stephane, and the change to tools/perf has an ack-of-sorts from Arnaldo: > Only: > > Subject: [PATCH V4 03/10] perf, tool: Conditional branch filter 'cond' added to perf record > > Which is a one liner, touches tools/perf/, and I'm ok with it. cheers