From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 2/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Add long atomic examples to memory-barriers.txt
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:59:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386799151-2219-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386799151-2219-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Although the atomic_long_t functions are quite useful, they are a bit
obscure. This commit therefore adds the common ones alongside their
atomic_t counterparts in Documentation/memory-barriers.txt.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 1d067235b0bc..2d22da095a60 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1728,21 +1728,23 @@ explicit lock operations, described later). These include:
xchg();
cmpxchg();
- atomic_xchg();
- atomic_cmpxchg();
- atomic_inc_return();
- atomic_dec_return();
- atomic_add_return();
- atomic_sub_return();
- atomic_inc_and_test();
- atomic_dec_and_test();
- atomic_sub_and_test();
- atomic_add_negative();
- atomic_add_unless(); /* when succeeds (returns 1) */
+ atomic_xchg(); atomic_long_xchg();
+ atomic_cmpxchg(); atomic_long_cmpxchg();
+ atomic_inc_return(); atomic_long_inc_return();
+ atomic_dec_return(); atomic_long_dec_return();
+ atomic_add_return(); atomic_long_add_return();
+ atomic_sub_return(); atomic_long_sub_return();
+ atomic_inc_and_test(); atomic_long_inc_and_test();
+ atomic_dec_and_test(); atomic_long_dec_and_test();
+ atomic_sub_and_test(); atomic_long_sub_and_test();
+ atomic_add_negative(); atomic_long_add_negative();
test_and_set_bit();
test_and_clear_bit();
test_and_change_bit();
+ /* when succeeds (returns 1) */
+ atomic_add_unless(); atomic_long_add_unless();
+
These are used for such things as implementing LOCK-class and UNLOCK-class
operations and adjusting reference counters towards object destruction, and as
such the implicit memory barrier effects are necessary.
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 21:58 [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking] Memory-barrier documentation updates + smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 1/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Add needed ACCESS_ONCE() calls to memory-barriers.txt Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-12-16 10:39 ` [tip:core/locking] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Add long atomic examples " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 3/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Prohibit speculative writes Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-12 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12 15:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-13 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-16 10:39 ` [tip:core/locking] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 4/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Document ACCESS_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:40 ` [tip:core/locking] " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 5/8] locking: Add an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() for UNLOCK+LOCK barrier Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:40 ` [tip:core/locking] locking: Add an smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() for UNLOCK+BLOCK barrier tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 6/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Downgrade UNLOCK+LOCK Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:40 ` [tip:core/locking] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Downgrade UNLOCK+BLOCK tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 7/8] rcu: Apply smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() to preserve grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:40 ` [tip:core/locking] " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-11 21:59 ` [PATCH v6 tip/core/locking 8/8] powerpc: Full barrier for smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:40 ` [tip:core/locking] " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-16 10:39 ` [tip:core/locking] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Add needed ACCESS_ONCE() calls to memory-barriers.txt tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386799151-2219-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®