From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751797Ab3LLOmP (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:42:15 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:64207 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751358Ab3LLOmN (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:42:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1386859322.6056.83.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3]hrtimer: Fix a performance regression by disable reprogramming in remove_hrtimer From: Mike Galbraith To: Ethan Zhao Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , rjw@sisk.pl, Daniel Lezcano , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:42:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <24EECBCC-F655-404F-8946-73CC36095A5F@gmail.com> <1378362989.18435.2.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130905111428.GB23362@gmail.com> <1378386697.6567.9.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130905133750.GA26637@gmail.com> <1378445942.5434.31.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130909122325.GX31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1378730538.5586.30.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20130909133044.GB31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130909134635.GB26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20130911085643.GS26785@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <1378895123.5476.83.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1381120901.9926.11.camel@marge.simpson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:5nE9T27Z9DcjfR6kg9EwF+LRYo2AdGXBandhBOJTETE A2QfTLfFtw09EiiJi4CltzqqIexefaPktVBkkstgzHbrFBbV5a yZ1F9Sa8+Rie5EgqrpxTAplYNjpedlkqly6vqV40Aa7VP+p3IX 7Yd5J8M5P90xIXgvX3VS/0jpNQ0CBknlDxwHBn1kAohPwuDjx6 b7jjYLXcUda+VtUJV3y0Uo2gfkV3ZDCHPtc0TlKExGpDtcwQDe FypUUrH1npg244bEeD4d3i71TgmFtuoCTsP4PkZuJnMXdu88pf foaPSe5eQ2HXJxtTMFnVGljHjNSYypyTAkYxBQV2t6n6hDbLE4 Z5nFIxvKvZ0EpXrMut+h8o5a1P7s6ZusClskEBMmdf8AtEUESe CPP4gKe6cmuKg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 22:14 +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote: > Mike, > it seems the IPI issue got root cause (cpu hardware errata ) now ? > I only catch some pieces of the mails, is that to say the crazy horse > made by Intel will wake up unexpected, and eat too much reschedule > IPI, then the horse got hotter, performance down, and so the fix would > be a 'CFLUSH' to all the buggy CPU, is that right ? You're mixing a couple different issues together, but yeah, close enough. The barking amazonian tree guppy is being saved as we speak. -Mike