From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754126Ab3LNTe3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:34:29 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:48712 "EHLO mail-lb0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753791Ab3LNTe1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 14:34:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1387049660.7152.317.camel@host5.omatika.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/16] ARM: dts: provide DMA config to pxamci From: Sergei Ianovich To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Mack , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Russell King , Chris Ball , Viresh Kumar , Shawn Guo , Haojian Zhuang , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 23:34:20 +0400 In-Reply-To: <201312142006.26979.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1386543229-1542-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1386901645-28895-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1386901645-28895-4-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <201312142006.26979.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 20:06 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 13 December 2013, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as > > IORESOURCE_DMA. However, there is was no way to get them from > > device tree. > > Please update this changeset comment, I think it still refers to > the earlier version. --- Non-dts implementation supply required DMA channel numbers as IORESOURCE_DMA. We can also get them from the device tree, if it is present. --- Is this fine? Should I post v3, if so? > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Ianovich > > CC: Daniel Mack > > CC: Arnd Bergmann > > The patch looks ok in case we are merging your patches for 3.14 > and Daniel's patches later than that. If they end up in the > same merge window however, we'd have to be care to resolve > the obvious conflict in a proper way. The most recently published Daniel's patch (Aug 2013) wraps IORESOURCE_DMA handling on DT presence in a similar way, but doesn't do any actual DT processing. So there is no conflict at the moment. Daniel can comment better on this, though.