From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753905Ab3LRLv0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:51:26 -0500 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:5098 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752131Ab3LRLvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:51:25 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,507,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="85700450" Message-ID: <1387367482.27441.123.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests From: Ian Campbell To: Stefano Stabellini CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , , Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:51:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 17:53 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb. > As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb. > Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM > guests, they are not affected. and if a toolstack did I think it would be reasonable to expect the kernel to at least try and drive it! > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Acked-by: Ian Campbell