From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@linaro.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<R65777@freescale.com>, <B08248@freescale.com>,
<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
<a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com>, <agraf@suse.de>,
<B16395@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [REPOST][PATCH 1/2] driver core: Add new device_driver flag to allow binding via sysfs only
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:22:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387484531.3140.134.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131219010729.GC23055@kroah.com>
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:07 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:34:46PM +0000, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > VFIO supports pass-through of devices to user space - for sake
> > of illustration, say a PCI e1000 device:
> >
> > - the e1000 is first unbound from the PCI e1000 driver via sysfs
> > - the vfio-pci driver is told via new_id that it now handles e1000 devices
> > - the e1000 is explicitly bound to vfio-pci through sysfs
> >
> > However, now we have two drivers in the system that both handle e1000
> > devices. A hotplug event could then occur and it is ambiguous as to which
> > driver will claim the device. The desired semantics is that vfio-pci is
> > only bound to devices by explicit request in sysfs. This patch makes this
> > possible by introducing a sysfs_bind_only flag in struct device_driver.
>
> Why deal with this at all and not just deal with the "bind" sysfs file
> instead? That way no driver core logic needs to be changed at all, and
> your userspace tools know _exactly_ which device is being bound to the
> new device.
>
> Don't mess with the "new_id" file for stuff like this, as you point out,
> it's "tricky"...
As discussed before, "bind" does not bypass the ID checks, and thus it
does not work without either "new_id" or a wildcard match.
Or are you proposing changing "bind" so that it does bypass the ID
checks? Or perhaps a new "force_bind" file that does?
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 12:34 Kim Phillips
2013-12-03 15:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-12-05 17:45 ` Kim Phillips
2013-12-05 22:38 ` Scott Wood
2013-12-09 18:58 ` Kim Phillips
2013-12-09 19:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-12-09 21:33 ` Scott Wood
2013-12-19 1:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 1:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 20:22 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2013-12-19 20:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 21:06 ` Stuart Yoder
2013-12-19 21:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 22:15 ` Scott Wood
2013-12-19 22:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-19 23:08 ` Stuart Yoder
2013-12-20 0:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1387484531.3140.134.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=B08248@freescale.com \
--cc=B16395@freescale.com \
--cc=R65777@freescale.com \
--cc=a.motakis@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kim.phillips@linaro.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®