From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
kmo@daterainc.com
Subject: Re: bio_integrity_verify() bug causing READ verify to be silently skipped
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 00:52:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1387875122.5567.241.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387858826.5567.236.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 20:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Hi Martin & Co,
>
> So after playing with the mainline DIF client against an initial WIP
> target DIF support patch, I've started hitting a bug in
> bio_integrity_verify() that causes READ verify logic to be silently
> skipped for both WIP target and existing scsi_debug DIF code.
>
> The issue is with the scsi_end_request() -> blk_end_request() completion
> path, where eventually blk_update_request() -> req_bio_endio() ->
> bio_advance() is called to increment bio->bi_idx to a non-zero value.
>
> Given that bio_integrity_verify() is using bio_for_each_segment(), the
> loop starts from the updated bio->bi_idx, and not a zero value, which
> ends up skipping individual bio segment calls to bi->verify_fn().
>
> The following patch changes bio_integrity_verify() to use
> bio_for_each_segment_all() instead of bio_for_each_segment() to ensure
> that the segment walk always starts from zero, regardless of the current
> bio->bi_idx value after bio_advance().
>
> Note this bug has been observed with v3.13-rc3 code, and I haven't yet
> looked back to figure out when this bug was first introduced.. Any
> ideas..?
So the commit that introduced bio_advance() into req_bio_endio() code
was:
commit f79ea4161434b31e351658283b24e92c3e570142
Author: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Date: Thu Sep 20 16:38:30 2012 -0700
block: Refactor blk_update_request()
So AFAICT this has been broken since v3.10..
(CC'ing kmo)
--nab
>
> Interestingly enough, the scsi-mq alpha code does not suffer from this
> bug, as blk_end_request() is never called from scsi_mq_end_request() ->
> blk_mq_end_io() completion path code.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --nab
>
> From 32242942edca095e8dd126cb1408f2842340773e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 04:00:24 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] bio-integrity: Fix bio_integrity_verify segment start bug
>
> This patch addresses a bug in bio_integrity_verify() code that has
> been causing DIF READ verify operations to be silently skipped.
>
> The issue is that bio->bi_idx will have been incremented within
> bio_advance() code in the normal blk_update_request() ->
> req_bio_endio() completion path, and bio_integrity_verify() is
> using bio_for_each_segment() which starts the bio segment walk
> at the current bio->bi_idx.
>
> So instead use bio_for_each_segment_all() to always start the bio
> segment walk from zero, regardless of the current bio->bi_idx
> value after bio_advance() has been called.
>
> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> ---
> fs/bio-integrity.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bio-integrity.c b/fs/bio-integrity.c
> index fc60b31..f1d5cde 100644
> --- a/fs/bio-integrity.c
> +++ b/fs/bio-integrity.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int bio_integrity_verify(struct bio *bio)
> bix.disk_name = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk->disk_name;
> bix.sector_size = bi->sector_size;
>
> - bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i) {
> + bio_for_each_segment_all(bv, bio, i) {
> void *kaddr = kmap_atomic(bv->bv_page);
> bix.data_buf = kaddr + bv->bv_offset;
> bix.data_size = bv->bv_len;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-24 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-24 4:20 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-12-24 8:52 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2014-01-03 20:09 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-17 5:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2014-01-17 21:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2014-01-21 23:53 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2014-01-22 4:24 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1387875122.5567.241.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®