mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11]  use ether_addr_equal_64bits
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 19:56:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388429761.4410.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388427307-8691-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> (sfid-20131230_182319_112673_F481A1D3)

On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 19:15 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> Ether_addr_equal_64bits is more efficient than ether_addr_equal, and can be
> used when each argument is an array within a structure that contains at
> least two bytes of data beyond the array.
> 
> The structures involved are:
> iwl_rxon_cmd defined in drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/commands.h and
> ieee80211_hdr defined in include/linux/ieee80211.h
> 
> This was done using Coccinelle (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/).

Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add
it when we take the patch ...

Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that
struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a
structure that contains at least two more bytes")?

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-30 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30 18:14 [PATCH 0/11] " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/11] rt2x00: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 16:44   ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/11] ath5k: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/11] mac80211: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:10   ` Christian Lamparter
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 4/11] " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:56   ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-12-30 19:58     ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 21:25       ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-30 21:57         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-12-30 23:13           ` Johannes Berg
2013-12-30 23:17             ` Joe Perches
2013-12-31  6:32               ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 15:54                 ` Ben Greear
2013-12-31 16:09                   ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31 16:27                     ` Ben Greear
2013-12-31 16:40                       ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  9:05                         ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  9:09                           ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06 10:17                             ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  8:48               ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  8:59                 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-06  9:04                   ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06  9:07                     ` Johannes Berg
2014-01-06  9:20                       ` Julia Lawall
2013-12-31  6:26             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-01-06  9:24               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-06  9:35                 ` Julia Lawall
2014-01-06 15:18                 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-01-06 10:48             ` Dan Carpenter
2014-01-17 10:18               ` Dan Carpenter
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 5/11] mwl8k: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 6/11] rtlwifi: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 21:08   ` Larry Finger
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 7/11] iwlegacy: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 8/11] " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 9/11] ipw2x00: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] at76c50x-usb: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] carl9170: " Julia Lawall
2013-12-30 18:10   ` Christian Lamparter
2014-01-17 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/11] " Pavel Machek
2014-01-17 22:02   ` Oleksij Rempel
2014-01-17 22:43     ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1388429761.4410.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®