From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752829AbaAKNlZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:41:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:42602 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751616AbaAKNlY (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 08:41:24 -0500 From: Monam Agarwal To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bergwolf@gmail.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com, keith.mannthey@intel.com, oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Staging: lustre: Fix return does not need parantheses Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:11:08 +0530 Message-Id: <1389447668-9605-1-git-send-email-monamagarwal123@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This fixes the following checkpatch error in lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c index c9aae13..07a2c33 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c @@ -81,18 +81,18 @@ int ldlm_flock_blocking_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock_desc *desc, static inline int ldlm_same_flock_owner(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new) { - return((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner == + return (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner == lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner) && - (new->l_export == lock->l_export)); + (new->l_export == lock->l_export); } static inline int ldlm_flocks_overlap(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new) { - return((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start <= + return (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start <= lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end) && (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end >= - lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start)); + lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start); } static inline void ldlm_flock_blocking_link(struct ldlm_lock *req, -- 1.7.9.5