From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver/IFC: Move Freescale IFC driver to a common driver
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:47:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389638849.24905.51.camel@snotra.buserror.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401131432.36880.arnd@arndb.de>
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 13 January 2014, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> > Freescale IFC controller has been used for mpc8xxx. It will be used
> > for ARM-based SoC as well. This patch moves the driver to driver/misc
> > and fix the header file includes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar@freescale.com>
>
> No objections to the driver, but drivers/misc doesn't seem like the
> right place. Why not drivers/mfd or drivers/memory?
It's not a memory controller in the sense that I think most people would
interpret the phrase, but I guess it's similar in function to
mvebu-devbus. If drivers/memory is broad enough to cover such things,
and doesn't have a memory controller subsystem that drivers are supposed
to register with, then that could work.
Are things in drivers/mfd expected to interact with mfd-core.c? It's
not clear to me what that does or how it would be useful to the IFC
code.
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 5:24 Prabhakar Kushwaha
2014-01-13 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-13 18:47 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2014-01-13 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-13 20:10 ` Scott Wood
2014-01-13 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-13 21:24 ` Scott Wood
2014-01-13 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389638849.24905.51.camel@snotra.buserror.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome