Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] reciprocal_divide: correction/update of the algorithm

[Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>]

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:37 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> 
> > - * or else the performance is slower than a normal divide.
> > - */
> > -extern u32 reciprocal_value(u32 B);
> > +struct reciprocal_value {
> > +	u32 m;
> > +	u8 sh1, sh2;
> > +};
> >
> > +#define RECIPROCAL_VALUE_RESULT_TO_ZERO ((struct reciprocal_value){.sh1 = 32})
> >
> > -static inline u32 reciprocal_divide(u32 A, u32 R)
> > +struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d);
> 
> A function that returns a struct? That works? Which gcc versions support
> it?

At least since gcc 1.29, given:

Thu Sep 22 15:57:41 1988  Richard Stallman  (rms at sugar-bombs.ai.mit.edu)
[...]
	* stmt.c (expand_function_start): Set current_function_needs_context
	and current_function_returns_struct.

Hope that's not a problem...

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.