From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751475AbaAPWRa (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:17:30 -0500 Received: from mail1.windriver.com ([147.11.146.13]:52307 "EHLO mail1.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbaAPWR2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:17:28 -0500 From: Paul Gortmaker To: CC: Paul Gortmaker , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Subject: [PATCH] ia64: don't use module_init for non-modular core kernel/mca.c code Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:16:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1389910599-3883-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The mca.c code is always built in. It will never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading. Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing. Direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs prioritized ones. Use of device_initcall is consistent with what __initcall maps onto, and hence does not change the init order, making the impact of this change zero. Should someone with real hardware for boot testing want to change it later to arch_initcall or something different, they can do that at a later date. Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/mca.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/mca.c index 27793f7aa99c..5b799d4deb74 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/mca.c +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/mca.c @@ -142,5 +142,4 @@ static int __init sn_salinfo_init(void) salinfo_platform_oemdata = &sn_salinfo_platform_oemdata; return 0; } - -module_init(sn_salinfo_init) +device_initcall(sn_salinfo_init); -- 1.8.5.2