From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753001AbaAVRre (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:47:34 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0130.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.130]:46938 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752695AbaAVRrb (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:47:31 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2110:2393:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3743:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:6117:6691:7652:7903:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12114:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13076:13161:13229:13255:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,M X-HE-Tag: rub73_7b603d2f3b715 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2171 Message-ID: <1390412846.31946.68.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [tip:core/urgent] MAINTAINERS: Restore "L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" entries From: Joe Perches To: Ingo Molnar Cc: hpa@zytor.com, alan@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:47:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20140122173622.GA12023@gmail.com> References: <1390325069.2472.78.camel@joe-AO722> <20140122122728.GA8882@gmail.com> <1390395744.31946.45.camel@joe-AO722> <20140122173622.GA12023@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Joe Perches wrote: > > > Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml > > because section entries don't specify it explicitly. > > No, my main argument continues to be that having a 'at a glance' > contact summary _in a single place_ is eminently useful to humans, > because it's so simple: I don't doubt simplicity is good. > You never even > _acknowledged_ my main point, let alone countered it successfully. There's no 'counter' to it. You simply don't seem to agree that some people will choose _not_ to cc lkml when some sections have it and others sections don't. > Hence you came up with this false 'conclusion' prematurely and > presented it with baseless, cocky self-confidence. > What an annoyingly unproductive waste of time. Any discussion where someone disagrees with you seems to end with you asserting that. I doubt it's true. > Thanks, Anytime. cheers, Joe